error codes
A recent Scott Hanselman post [http://www.hanselman.com/blog/WindowsDefenderErrors0x8024402c0x80240022And1609.aspx] described a problem he had with Windows Defender [http://www.microsoft.com/athome/security/spyware/software/default.mspx]: > Defender was unable to update my signatures, instead throwing a COM-ish 0x8024402c. Others are getting Error 1609 and still
acronyms
As a commenter noted in my previous post on how not to give a presentation, I have another complaint about software development presentations that I didn't list. They're chock full of meaningless acronyms. SOAP, BI, SOA, RDBMS, SGML, CRUD, RMS, RDBMS, XML, ORM, FAQ. I appreciate
usability
Jensen Harris recently cited some Microsoft Office usability research which produced a rather counter-intuitive result [http://blogs.msdn.com/jensenh/archive/2005/11/29/497861.aspx]: > One of the most interesting epiphanies I've had over the last few years seems on the surface like a paradox: "
programming languages
Have you ever worked with developers that were charter members of the third-party-control-of-the-month club? You know the kind-- they never met a third party control they didn't like. They spend all day trolling downloads and experimenting with every tool listed on The Daily Grind. Which means deploying your
software development concepts
Philip Chu's Seven Habits of Highly Effective Programmers [http://www.technicat.com/writing/programming.html] is witty, eloquent, and peppered with illustrative real world anecdotes: > Upon joining an early-stage startup called Neomar, I found myself in two months of design meetings for a wireless internet portal that
case sensitivity
One of the most pernicious problems with C-based languages is that they're case-sensitive. While this decision may have made sense in 1972 when the language was created [http://cm.bell-labs.com/cm/cs/who/dmr/chist.html], one wonders why the sins of Kernighan and Ritchie [http://cm.
documentation
Have you ever noticed that much of the online MSDN .NET framework help is.. not helpful? Take the the MSDN help for the IBindingList.AddIndex method [http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/cpref/html/frlrfSystemComponentModelIBindingListClassAddIndexTopic.asp] , for example: Scott Swigart calls this undocumentation, and elaborates further
programming languages
Artima has another great interview series, this time with Erich Gamma. You know, Erich Gamma: Gang of Four, JUnit, Eclipse. As you might expect from such a notable developer, it's full of great advice. Like this section on avoiding frameworkitis: Frameworkitis is the disease that a framework wants
programming languages
In Software Training Sucks: Why We Need to Roll it Back 1,000 Years [http://www.softwarebyrob.com/2005/11/15/software-training-sucks-roll-it-back/], Rob Walling makes a compelling argument for abandoning traditional training classes in favor of apprenticeships: > [Why not] use the time-tested approach of trades that have been doing
software development concepts
During the fantastic Monad [http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=2AC59B30-5A44-4782-B0B7-79FE2EFD1280&displaylang=en] session at PDC 2005*, Jeffrey Snover and Jim Truher illustrated the tradeoff between verbosity and conciseness: cp c:apples c:oranges -fo -r copy-item c:apples c:oranges -force -recurse Monad has a ton
lazy programming
Philipp Lenssen agrees that inspired laziness is a desirable trait for software developers: .. only lazy programmers will want to write the kind of tools that might replace them in the end. Only a lazy programmer will avoid writing monotonous, repetitive code. The tools and processes inspired by laziness speed up
software development concepts
Joel has a lengthy entry in which he asks, does having the "best programmers" really matter? This is something I've talked about before: extreme skill disparity is unique to the profession of software development. The odds of working with a genius or a jackass on any